← All Scores / CEG
BULL energy-power Constellation Energy

CEG

9 -60 all-time
Last scored 2026-07-14

Nuclear fleet provides the 24/7 carbon-free baseload power that hyperscaler AI data centers increasingly require.

Reading — Higher scores = stronger evidence of agentic AI tailwinds benefiting this company.
§ 01 — Why this score

Conviction breakdown

Despite a compelling nuclear-energy-meets-AI story, the stock has fallen sharply and there is little evidence the decline is over, making the fund very cautious.

Case for the company
How strongly the company fits the agentic-AI disruption story
79 0
Odds it pays off
How likely the call actually works out
42 0
Near-term catalysts
Upcoming news or events that could move the stock
65 +5
Price momentum
Whether the stock's own recent price trend is rising
40 -8
Financial strength
Balance-sheet and business soundness — higher means safer
60 0
How the score works. These five signals are weighed together into one forward-looking conviction from 0–100 — it's a judgment, not a sum of the bars. That number is then ranked against every other stock we track, so it can also move when other stocks move. It reflects the outlook from here, not how the price has done for us.
Initial read this run: 28 → ranked to 9.
§ 02 — Score History
100
Ceiling
9
Latest
0
Floor
§ 03 — Analyst notes

Run-by-run detail

The fund's full reasoning for each scoring run, in its own words. More technical than the plain-English summary above.

2026-07-14 9 -23

CEG shows active deterioration on the forward view: stock has collapsed ~39% from highs, win-probability is a weak 42, and momentum is dead at 40. The nuclear-AI thesis remains intellectually intact (thesis_pct 79) but Win-Prob > Thesis in our framework, and the price action is telling us the market has already re-rated this. No convergence, no urgency to catch a falling knife.

2026-07-13 32 -26

Thesis percentile respectable at 79 but Win-Probability at 42 is the tell — nuclear/AI narrative has already played out and reversed hard, with stock down ~39% from 52wk high. Weight favors Win-Prob per our framework. No catalyst on deck to reverse the downtrend. Skip.

2026-07-12 58 -5

Compressed valuation and strong thesis narrative but win-probability and momentum both weak. Falling knife setup on a name that needs a specific catalyst to reverse. Not compelling enough to enter here.

2026-07-11 63 -9

Thesis specialist likes the compression to 20 PE on nuclear/AI-power, but win_prob and momentum both say the trend is broken and the sector re-rating is ongoing. Doesn't meet convergence for a new_buy. Interesting on a stabilization signal, not today.

2026-07-10 72 +20

Thesis is strong on paper but win-probability and momentum say the market has decisively rerated this name lower. High thesis with collapsing tape is the exact profile that burns capital. Doesn't clear new_buy bar.

2026-07-09 52 -11

Strong long-term thesis on nuclear/AI power but win-probability and momentum both signal active breakdown. Stock has lost the narrative — down 42% from highs and hugging 52w lows with poor technical trend. Two specialists effectively signal deterioration. Fails convergence bar. Skip until momentum stabilizes.

2026-07-08 63 +17

Thesis remains attractive on nuclear + AI power demand and valuation has compressed meaningfully, but win-probability and momentum both signal the trend is broken. Win-prob rule dominates thesis here — no convergence, catalyst not strong enough to force urgency. Wait for stabilization.

2026-07-07 46 -12

Thesis specialist likes the compressed valuation on the nuclear/AI-power narrative but win-probability and momentum say the trend is broken. Doesn't meet convergence bar for new_buy. Catalyst flow can't rescue a name where technicals have gone this cold. Wait for stabilization.

2026-07-06 58 -23

Interesting contrarian setup — thesis is strong at 79 and valuation has compressed hard, but win-probability and momentum both say the knife is still falling. Per our operating principles, WP > thesis for the final call. Needs stabilization before this becomes actionable; not yet.

2026-07-05 81 +12

Strong thematic thesis around nuclear/AI power demand and supportive catalysts, but the stock is deep in a drawdown from $412 to $264 with weak momentum. Win-probability is only 50, and we weight that over thesis. Doesn't meet the 60/65 convergence bar for new_buy. Watch for momentum stabilization before re-engaging.

2026-07-04 69 -1

Thesis is fine at 79 and catalyst tape supports nuclear/power AI demand, but the stock itself is 36% off highs with momentum in the 8th percentile — the market is not confirming the story. Win-probability of 50 is a coin flip. This is exactly the setup where I want to wait for price to confirm before adding a new name. Skip.

2026-07-03 70 +13

Nuclear/power AI-demand thesis is intact and catalysts support it, but momentum is deeply broken (4th percentile) and win-probability sits at only 50. Fails the new_buy convergence bar (win_prob<65). Stock quality is fine but the forward setup lacks a re-rating trigger from here. Skip, revisit on momentum confirmation.

2026-06-30 57 -10

Strong thesis on nuclear/power-AI demand but the tape disagrees — stock is 36% off the 52w high with momentum in the 13th percentile. Win-probability only 50, and convergence bar (thesis>=60 AND wp>=65) is not met. Skip on watchlist; revisit on a momentum reversal.

2026-06-29 67 +3

Power/AI thesis is intact and the company is high quality, but the stock has rolled over (-36% from highs) and momentum is firmly broken. Win-probability only 50, which gets the heavier weight in my framework. Doesn't clear the 60/65 convergence bar for new_buy. Wait for a momentum turn before paying up.

2026-06-28 64 -4

Strong nuclear/AI-power thesis but the tape doesn't confirm — sitting 34% off highs with weak momentum while peers in the same theme (TLN, VST) are near highs. Win-probability of 60 fails the new-buy convergence bar (need 65+). This is a thesis-led name without the price action; pass for now.

2026-06-27 68 +1

Strong long-term nuclear/AI-power thesis but the tape is broken — stock is 34% below highs while peers like TLN/VST rip. Win-probability only 60 and no fresh catalyst. Convergence bar (thesis>=60 AND win_prob>=65) fails on win_prob. Watch, don't chase.

2026-06-26 67 -5

Strong thesis on AI power demand but weak tape (24th percentile momentum, 34% below 52wk high) plus win_probability only 60 — fails the new_buy convergence bar of WP>=65. Narrative is good but the stock isn't acting like it. Skip until momentum confirms.

2026-06-25 72 -3

Strong thesis and supportive catalyst on nuclear/AI power demand, but win_probability=60 falls just short of the 65 convergence bar for new buys, and momentum is genuinely weak with the stock 34% off highs. The 'thesis-led mean reversion' override wants thesis>=70 plus a specific sector TAM headline — this qualifies thematically but the tape is too soft to lead. Constructive watchlist name, not a buy today.

2026-06-24 75 +4

Strong forward thesis on nuclear powering AI data centers, and the KKR/Vistra deal is a direct peer catalyst. But win-probability is only 60 and momentum is weak with the stock 34% off highs — this is exactly the 'great story, weak tape' setup the MSFT loss flagged. Fails the 60/65 convergence bar for new buy. Constructive but not actionable here.

2026-06-23 71 +2

Strong long-term nuclear/AI power thesis but the tape is not confirming — stock sits well below highs while peers (TLN, VST) have ripped. This is the Microsoft failure pattern: high thesis, weak momentum. Win-probability is only moderate and no concrete catalyst is on deck. Fails convergence bar for new buy.

2026-06-22 69 +30

Thesis is solid on the nuclear/AI power story but the stock is not participating — sitting 34% off highs while peer TLN is breaking out is the MSFT-pattern warning sign. Win-probability of 60 falls below the 65 new-buy bar and momentum is in the bottom third. Strong narrative, weak stock. Skip until tape confirms.

2026-06-21 39 +21

Thesis percentile is strong at 81 and the Vera Rubin power-bill catalyst is a direct read-through, but Win-Probability is only 30 and the stock is sitting near 52wk lows with no momentum confirmation. Per our rule, Win-Probability outweighs Thesis on the score. Convergence bar for new_buy (thesis>=60 AND win_prob>=65) is not met. Skip until momentum confirms the catalyst.

2026-06-20 18 -4

Thesis percentile is decent at 81 on the nuclear/AI power narrative, but Win-Probability collapses to 30 because the stock is in a sustained downtrend, 38% off highs, with no concrete catalyst to reverse. Convergence bar fails badly. Skip.

2026-06-19 22 -8

Thesis is intact on nuclear/AI power demand but win-probability is weak and the stock is in a sustained downtrend 38% off highs. No name-specific catalyst to force a reversal. Weighting Win-Probability over Thesis per doctrine, this is a skip until momentum confirms.

2026-06-18 30 +10

Thesis is intact but the setup is broken — stock has been in a sustained downtrend near 52wk lows with no catalyst-specific reversal. Win-probability of 30 dominates here; thesis percentile means little if the tape disagrees. Doesn't clear new_buy convergence bar (WP<65). Skip.

2026-06-17 20 -27

Thesis percentile is solid at 81 on the nuclear/AI power demand story, but Win-Probability collapses to 30 with the stock 38% off highs and momentum only mid-range. Per our weighting, WP > thesis, and watchlist new buys require WP >= 65. Skip until price action confirms reversal.

2026-06-16 47 +21

Thesis is solid at 81 and the AI-power data center catalyst is real, but Win-Probability at 30 is a clear specialist warning that the setup isn't working from here. Stock is deep in a downtrend and the bounce is unconfirmed. Per our learnings, we chase breakouts on AI-infra power names, not falling knives. Skip until momentum confirms.

2026-06-15 26 +12

Thesis is intact on nuclear/AI power demand, but Win-Probability is decisively negative — the stock is in a sustained downtrend 38% off highs with no momentum and catalysts haven't translated to price. Per our rules, Win-Probability trumps Thesis, and a strong narrative without price confirmation doesn't earn capital. Skip on watchlist.

2026-06-14 14 +5

Thesis remains intact on the nuclear/AI power story but Win-Probability is signaling an active breakdown, not an oversold setup. Two of four signals (win_prob, momentum) point to deterioration with no specific positive catalyst. Per our principle that win-probability outweighs thesis for the forward call, this scores low. Not a convergence buy.

2026-06-14 9 -25

Thesis percentile is high but Win-Probability is just 28 and momentum signals an active breakdown, not a constructive oversold setup. Two specialists effectively flag deterioration. Without a concrete catalyst to reverse the slide, this is a falling knife rather than an oversold-quality override. Skip.

2026-06-13 34 +4

Bull thesis on nuclear/AI power is intact (thesis_pct 81) but the technical setup is a breakdown, not an oversold-quality buy. Win-prob agent flags continued selling pressure with no catalyst reversal. Fails the convergence bar for new_buy (win_prob 28 << 65). Watchlist only — wait for stabilization.

2026-06-12 30 +19

Thesis is intact (81) and catalysts support data center power demand, but Win-Probability flags active breakdown to 52w lows with no accumulation signal. Convergence bar for new_buy (thesis>=60 AND win_prob>=65) fails badly on win_prob. Skip until technicals stabilize.

2026-06-11 11 0

Bull thesis at 81 percentile is interesting but Win-Probability agent flags this as a breakdown, not accumulation, with -38% from highs and continued selling. Hard rule #4 favors win_probability, and at 28 with momentum at 17 this is not a setup. Capacity-shortfall narrative is a fresh headwind. Skip.

2026-06-10 11 0

Thesis is fine (81) but Win-Probability is severely negative at 28 with momentum_pct=14 and stock in breakdown mode, 38% off highs. Per rule 4, win-prob > thesis in tiebreaker. Adding to already concentrated energy-power sleeve into a downtrend is unjustified. Skip.

2026-06-09 11 -5

Thesis is solid at 81 but Win-Probability is brutal at 28 with stock in active breakdown, down 38% from highs with continued selling. Per our rules, Win-Probability is the tiebreaker for 'will it go up.' Not a new buy without convergence. Skip and revisit if base forms.

2026-06-08 16 -53

Thesis is constructive at 81 but Win-Probability agent flags active breakdown 38% off highs with no catalyst. Per our rules, Win-Probability trumps Thesis. The oversold-quality override doesn't apply cleanly here — no catalyst and momentum deeply negative. Skip on watchlist, revisit if a concrete nuclear/AI partnership headline emerges.

2026-06-07 69 -1

Thesis is strong at 81 but win_probability of 48 fails the 65 convergence bar for new buys. Stock is 30% off highs with momentum near zero — no breakout setup to override the win_prob veto. Wait for re-rating catalyst.

2026-06-06 70 +5

Strong thesis ranking (81) but win_probability of 48 and momentum of 12 fail the new_buy convergence bar (both thesis>=60 AND win_prob>=65 needed). Stock is 30% off highs with no near-term catalyst visibility. The contrarian-buy override applies only when win_prob>=70 — not the case here. Skip until either momentum turns or a PPA/contract catalyst emerges.

2026-06-05 65 +3

Best thesis of the power names but win_probability and momentum are the weakest. Stock is 30% off highs with no re-rating catalyst visible. Thesis without trajectory is a value trap setup. Skip pending momentum confirmation.

2026-06-04 62 +1

Strong thesis ranking but momentum is dead (10th percentile) and stock is 30% off highs. Win-probability of 48 fails the new-buy convergence test. Nuclear-AI narrative remains intact long-term, but no urgency — wait for a base to form or catalyst to materialize.

2026-06-03 61 -1

Strong long-term thesis on nuclear/AI power but win_probability of 48 and momentum_pct of 14 signal the market isn't ready to re-rate. 30% below highs without a clear catalyst is a falling knife setup. Convergence bar not met for new buy. Revisit if technical setup improves.

2026-06-02 62 -1

Strong thesis on nuclear/AI power but win_prob and momentum both weak. Stock 30% off highs with no near-term catalyst visibility. Fails convergence — thesis alone insufficient. Skip.

2026-06-01 63 -6

Strong thesis percentile but win-probability and momentum both weak — stock has declined 30% from highs without catalyst visibility. Fails convergence bar. No reason to chase here when momentum is broken.

2026-05-31 69 +4

CEG has the best thesis of the power names but Win-Probability is only 52 and momentum is 24 — stock is 29% off highs in clear corrective phase. Per our weighting (win-prob > thesis) and the convergence bar (need win_prob >= 65), this doesn't qualify for new_buy. Better to wait for a base to form.

2026-05-30 65 -3

Strong thesis on nuclear/AI power demand but Win-Probability agent flags the 29% drawdown from highs and uncertain trend. Convergence rule fails on win_prob. Watch for trend repair before acting.

2026-05-29 68 +7

Thesis is strong but Win-Probability is mediocre and momentum is decisively weak (32). Stock is 29% off highs with no direct catalyst. Fails convergence bar (win_prob<65). Per our weighting rule, Win-Prob > Thesis — skip until momentum re-engages.

2026-05-28 61 -17

Nuclear/AI power thesis attractive but Win-Probability of 52 and weak momentum (32) signal the trade isn't working right now. Fails convergence bar. Stock 29% off highs with no confirming catalyst. Skip.

2026-05-27 78 +14

CEG has the best thesis score of the power names and clean catalyst tie-in (India 700K GPU, SoftBank Japan, ByteDance $70B capex). But win_probability of 52 and momentum of 34 fail the convergence bar (need WP>=65) for new_buy. Stock is 29% off highs — trend has broken. Wait for a setup, don't anchor on thesis alone.

2026-05-26 64 -14

Strong thesis on nuclear power for AI but win probability is below our 65 convergence threshold and the stock is 29% off highs suggesting trend change. Thesis tells us what to care about, but win-prob tiebreaker says this isn't ready. Skip until momentum reasserts.

2026-05-25 78 +17

Strong thesis on nuclear powering AI datacenters with direct catalyst confirmation, but win_probability of 52 is the tell — stock is 29% off highs and momentum agent flagged potential trend change. Fails convergence bar (win_prob<65). Watchlist-worthy, not buyable here.

2026-05-24 61 -7

Thesis agent likes nuclear AI power but win-probability disagrees and the stock has lost momentum significantly. New-buy bar requires both thesis>=60 AND win_prob>=65 — fails on win-prob. Skip until momentum reasserts.

2026-05-23 68 -2

Strong thesis on nuclear/AI power but win_probability of 48 fails convergence bar. Stock has lost momentum, down 35% from peak with -2.78% weekly. Thesis intact long-term but no near-term setup. Skip.

2026-05-22 70 +3

Best thesis of the power names but win_probability at 48 fails the convergence bar for new_buy. Stock has de-rated 35% and near-term catalysts unclear. Park on watchlist; revisit if momentum reverses with a concrete data center PPA catalyst.

2026-05-21 67 -1

Thesis is solid on nuclear/AI power demand but win-prob agent sees no near-term catalyst for rebound. Convergence bar fails on win_probability. Better thesis than VST/TLN but still doesn't clear the new_buy bar.

2026-05-20 68 +15

Strong thesis but win-probability at 48 fails the convergence test for new buys (need >=65). Nuclear power AI narrative has cooled and momentum is negative. Skip until win-prob confirms.

2026-05-19 53 -14

Strong thesis and catalyst but win-prob only 48 — fails the convergence bar (need >=65). Nuclear AI narrative has cooled and momentum is 12. Concentration would also be problematic. Skip.

2026-05-18 67 -8

Better thesis ranking than VST but win_probability is sub-50 with negative near-term momentum and a 35% drawdown from highs. Doesn't clear the convergence bar for new_buy. Hold on watchlist; revisit if momentum turns.

2026-05-17 75 +9

Best thesis in the batch (78) but win_prob only 55 and momentum is broken (12). Fails convergence bar for new_buy (need win_prob>=65). Stock is 26% off highs — not a breakout setup we want to chase. Skip but keep watching for momentum turn.

2026-05-16 66 -3

Best thesis percentile of the power-bucket watchlist names, but fails new-buy convergence (win_prob 55 < 65). Stock is 26% off highs with momentum near zero — opposite of the breakout pattern that defines our winners. Wait for technical confirmation before initiating. Skip for now.

2026-05-15 69

Best thesis in batch but win_prob (55) below the 65 new_buy bar and momentum_pct=8 signals the nuclear/AI-power trade is in active correction. Catalyst is on-narrative but cannot override the broken technical setup. Skip until momentum repairs.

Supervisor: ATTENTION — the scoring pipeline has a non-blocking warning.