← All Scores / MRVL
BULL ai-chips Marvell Technology

MRVL

29 -65 all-time
Last scored 2026-07-14

Custom AI silicon and electro-optics for hyperscalers position Marvell at the heart of agentic AI networking infrastructure.

Reading — Higher scores = stronger evidence of agentic AI tailwinds benefiting this company.
§ 01 — Why this score

Conviction breakdown

The fund's confidence here is low and staying low, as the business case has slipped, recent price performance is weakening, and there is no clear event on the horizon to reverse the drift.

Case for the company
How strongly the company fits the agentic-AI disruption story
57 0
Odds it pays off
How likely the call actually works out
52 0
Near-term catalysts
Upcoming news or events that could move the stock
60 0
Price momentum
Whether the stock's own recent price trend is rising
30 -14
Financial strength
Balance-sheet and business soundness — higher means safer
70 0
How the score works. These five signals are weighed together into one forward-looking conviction from 0–100 — it's a judgment, not a sum of the bars. That number is then ranked against every other stock we track, so it can also move when other stocks move. It reflects the outlook from here, not how the price has done for us.
Initial read this run: 38 → ranked to 29.
§ 02 — Score History
100
Ceiling
29
Latest
0
Floor
§ 03 — Analyst notes

Run-by-run detail

The fund's full reasoning for each scoring run, in its own words. More technical than the plain-English summary above.

2026-07-14 29 0

Two specialists signal deterioration: thesis dropped to mid-tier, win-prob at 52, momentum in bottom third with -3% 5d. No obvious near-term catalyst to break the drift. Forward view is weak regardless of what we're holding. Trim on evidence — this is exactly the pattern the learnings flagged (MRVL -16% memory).

2026-07-13 29 -38

Two specialists signal deterioration: Win-Probability is barely coin-flip and momentum has rolled over with the stock 28% off highs. Thesis has slipped into mid-pack and there's no direct catalyst driver. Forward view has weakened meaningfully — score the stock, not the trade.

2026-07-12 67 +12

Middling scores across the board with meaningful short-term weakness and no company-specific catalyst. Forward setup is neutral-to-soft. Not a conviction name from here; holding rather than exiting because the AI custom-silicon thesis remains intact, but the score reflects mediocrity, not our cost basis.

2026-07-11 55 -7

Momentum has rolled over hard (-9.84% week) and thesis rank has fallen to mid-pack. Two forward signals softening at once — technical break and mediocre win-prob — while valuation stays demanding. Forward view has deteriorated relative to when this became a core position. Not an exit, but conviction is negative-lean from here.

2026-07-10 62 0

Thesis has slipped to mid-pack, momentum is flat-to-negative, and the stock is showing near-term distribution (-9.84% week). No MRVL-specific catalyst, just sector-adjacent read-throughs. Forward setup is neutral-to-negative from here; conviction fades.

2026-07-09 62 -7

Forward view has softened — thesis percentile mid-pack, meaningful near-term price weakness, stretched multiple needs execution. Not a breakdown yet, but no longer a leadership name. Neutral hold-level conviction; let the Sizer decide whether to trim on portfolio grounds.

2026-07-08 69 +17

Held name showing meaningful near-term weakness with negative momentum and mid-tier thesis. Catalyst piece is supportive but framed as contrarian. Not an active deterioration on multiple specialists — just tepid convergence. Hold as a lower-conviction position; Sizer decides trim depth.

2026-07-07 52 -13

Two specialists are flagging weakness: momentum is deteriorating hard (-9.84% 5d) and win-probability sees vulnerability at 84x PE with negative technicals. Thesis has slipped meaningfully from prior batches. This is deterioration on the forward signals — score the stock, not the trade. Trim.

2026-07-06 65 -23

Setup is deteriorating on the margins: momentum is soft, no MRVL-specific catalyst, and the thesis percentile has drifted to mid-pack. Not broken enough to force an exit — AI custom silicon narrative still intact — but conviction is neutral-to-soft from here. Held status justifies hold rather than trim; the Sizer can decide whether to lighten.

2026-07-05 88 +10

Past winner where thesis rank has cooled and momentum has weakened, but the catalyst read (hyperscaler ASIC contracts) directly confirms the original bull case. Hold; not a name to add on today's forward view without a clean breakout.

2026-07-04 78 0

Forward signals are middling across the board — mediocre thesis rank, sub-60 win-prob, and weak momentum with a 5-day pullback. Not a breakdown but not a name I'd add. Hold and let the Sizer decide whether to trim.

2026-07-03 78 -7

The MRVL breakout that delivered our win earlier has clearly rolled over — momentum 39, thesis slipped to 57, down 5% in 5 days, no direct catalyst. Win-prob 58 is mediocre. This is not deterioration hard enough to force an exit (thesis intact, risk quality decent), but the forward setup has weakened materially. Hold, don't add.

2026-06-30 85 0

Momentum still confirming and the custom-silicon/ASIC narrative remains the right side of the AI infrastructure trade. Thesis percentile has slipped relative to fresher names and win-prob is only 58, but the forward setup is still constructive. Hold-quality conviction, not add-quality.

2026-06-29 85 -6

Mid-tier conviction here. The custom-silicon thesis is alive and the stock is in a normal pullback rather than a breakdown — no two-specialist deterioration signal. Forward view remains constructive but not core. Hold.

2026-06-28 91 -6

Win-probability is the highest in the batch tied with AVGO at 72, and momentum is confirming with a 7%+ weekly move into breakout territory near $330. Per our learnings, AI-hardware names breaking 52w highs on hyperscaler ASIC narratives are exactly the pattern to trust. Thesis percentile slipped to 60 as other names rose, but the forward setup from here is strong. Hold and let it work.

2026-06-27 97 +3

Approaching 52w high on a 7% weekly move with real ASIC win narrative — the kind of price/catalyst combo we've learned to lean into. Win-probability is the strongest of the held names and the setup mirrors our prior MRVL winner. Forward expected return remains attractive.

2026-06-26 94 +1

Win-probability is the highest in the batch tied with AVGO, and price action is constructive heading into breakout territory at 52w highs. Thesis percentile slipped as newer AI names rose, but the forward setup — momentum confirming, catalysts in supportive narrative — keeps conviction strong. Pattern-match to prior MRVL winner.

2026-06-25 93 +7

Win-probability is the highest tier-2 in the batch and price is pressing the 52w high with strong 5-day momentum — the classic breakout-confirming setup from our winners playbook. Thesis percentile has compressed as newer names rose, but the forward setup from here remains strong. Solid hold.

2026-06-24 86 0

Win-probability is the highest weight in our framework and Marvell's at 72 with a strong recent move toward 52wk-high breakout territory. Thesis percentile slipped to 60 but the forward setup on custom silicon and hyperscaler capex remains intact. Constructive hold.

2026-06-23 86 -10

Win-probability leads the call here — strong 5d move and breakout territory with ASIC/optical DSP earnings revisions accelerating. Thesis percentile has slipped relative to batch but the forward setup is constructive. Hold the position; let the breakout play.

2026-06-22 96 +3

Win-probability 72 plus strong momentum approaching 52w high — the exact pattern our biggest winners showed. Thesis percentile is only middling but the forward win-rate signal and price action are what matter here. Constructive setup; let it run.

2026-06-21 93 -4

Win-prob and momentum both supportive on the custom-silicon ramp. Thesis percentile has slipped as fresher AI infra names rose, but the forward setup from here is still strong. This is exactly the MRVL pattern from learnings — hold the winner, let it work.

2026-06-20 97 -1

The custom ASIC ramp (Trainium, Google TPU exposure) plus strong momentum (5d +7.27%) and supportive 'Beyond Nvidia' narrative matches our winning pattern: AI-infra hardware breaking higher on named hyperscaler design wins. Win-Probability solidly 70. Forward setup remains strong; how much to size is the Sizer's call.

2026-06-19 98 +1

Best momentum in batch outside ARM/TSM, with a credible custom-silicon ramp story (Trainium, TPU) and supportive sector catalysts. Win-prob plus the price action mirror the playbook that worked. Forward setup remains strong.

2026-06-18 97 +3

Highest momentum in batch with the stock breaking out and a clear forward custom-silicon ramp story (Trainium, TPUs). Win-prob 70 and rising analyst revisions. This is exactly the breakout-AI-infra pattern our recent learnings tell us to lean into. Forward setup remains strong.

2026-06-17 94 -3

Strong momentum confirming a real ASIC design-win story with Trainium/TPU exposure. Win-probability solid and forward catalysts through 2025 are concrete. Thesis percentile slipped as newer infra names rose but the forward setup remains attractive.

2026-06-16 97 +1

Custom ASIC ramp (Trainium, TPU) intact with a specific forward product catalyst on optical interconnects sampling this year. Momentum confirming near highs, analyst revisions trending up. Forward setup remains strong even after the run. Thesis pct slipped only because newer names crowded the top; the AI-silicon ramp story is unchanged.

2026-06-15 96 +64

This is the exact pattern we got right before — AI-infra silicon with hyperscaler design wins and confirming momentum. Thesis percentile drifted to 60 but forward setup remains strong: custom silicon ramp through 2025, positive revision trajectory, 14% below highs (not pinned). Hold conviction stays high.

2026-06-14 32 -17

Win-prob has collapsed and the technical setup is broken with a severe 5d move down. Thesis percentile has also slipped to mid-pack. Two specialists effectively signal deterioration — forward setup no longer justifies the held weight. Trim.

2026-06-14 49 -49

Two specialists signaling deterioration: win probability collapsed to 38 and there's no direct Marvell catalyst — only sector-tailwind inference. The -16.7% 5d move is a real technical breakdown on a 91x PE name. Forward view from here is weak regardless of prior winner status. Trim.

2026-06-13 98 +1

Protect-winner rule applies: +36% from entry. Only one specialist (win_prob) signals active breakdown; thesis, catalyst, and risk remain constructive. Per core principle 1, do not cut conviction below 75 without 3-of-4 breakdown. Hold the winner, let it consolidate.

2026-06-12 97 +1

Per protect-winners rule, MRVL up 38% gets conviction floor of 75 unless 3 of 4 specialists signal breakdown — here only win_probability is clearly negative; thesis, catalyst, and risk remain constructive. Recent 5d weakness is concerning but performance and momentum percentiles remain elite. Hold the winner; do not trim on one bad week.

2026-06-11 96 0

Protect-winner rule applies: up 30% from entry. However, only one of four specialists (win_prob at 38) signals active breakdown, and the breakdown is technical not thesis-based. Performance and momentum scores remain strong. Per rule 1, do not cut below 75 unless 3 of 4 specialists deteriorate — we're at 1. Holding the winner; sizer can manage size given recent volatility.

2026-06-10 96 0

MRVL is up 25% from entry — winner protection rule applies. Only one specialist (win_prob) signals breakdown; thesis, catalyst, and risk_quality remain constructive. Recent 5d weakness is real but doesn't meet the 3-of-4 breakdown bar to cut a winner. Hold the position; do not chase further but do not rotate out of a +25% AI infrastructure name into choppy alternatives.

2026-06-09 96 0

Up 22% from entry — winner protection rule applies. Only one specialist (win_prob at 38) is flashing breakdown on the -16.7% 5d move; thesis, catalyst, and risk all remain constructive or neutral. Per our learning that MRVL-type winners deserve top-tier weight, we hold conviction in the high-70s despite the technical wobble. Do not rotate out of a +22% winner on momentum noise alone.

2026-06-08 96 +1

PROTECT WINNERS rule applies: held position up 45%+, so conviction floor is 75 unless 3 of 4 specialists signal active breakdown. Here only win_prob (38) is clearly negative; thesis (60), catalyst (60), and risk_quality (70) are constructive-to-neutral. Recent technical pullback is profit-taking after a massive run, not thesis breakdown. Hold the winner.

2026-06-07 95 -2

Winner up 28.5% from entry — PROTECT rule applies. Thesis percentile slipped to 60 as newer names rose, but no specialist signals breakdown; win_prob still 68 and price consolidating near highs. Custom ASIC thesis intact. Hold, do not trim a working winner for marginal rotation.

2026-06-06 97 -2

Classic winner to protect — up 28% from entry with momentum and performance at the top of the batch. Win-prob 68 and bull thesis intact. Do not let lower thesis_pct (60) drive a trim of a clear winner. Hold.

2026-06-05 99 +1

Textbook winner: +40% since entry, momentum at 93rd percentile, performance at 88, all four specialists constructive. Per core principle #1, do not reduce conviction below 75 on a +20%+ winner without 3-of-4 breakdown signals — and we have zero. Protect this. Let it run.

2026-06-04 98 +1

Textbook protect-the-winner: held position up 53.6% with momentum at 98th percentile and direct positive catalyst (Jensen calling out MRVL on AI infra). Per core principle 1, hold conviction high. Sizing concerns are for the portfolio sizer, not me.

2026-06-03 97 +1

MRVL up 49.5% since entry — squarely in protect-winner territory per Principle 1. Three of four specialists constructive (win_prob 68, catalyst 65, momentum 96, performance 93); only thesis percentile slipped to 60 because the watchlist refreshed, not because the AI ASIC story broke. No active breakdown signal. Hold high conviction. This is exactly the lesson from Micron/Palo Alto: keep scores pinned high on confirmed leaders.

2026-06-02 96 0

MRVL up 36% since entry — a clear winner. Three of four specialists constructive: win-prob, momentum, performance all strong, catalyst supportive. Thesis percentile dropped only because newer AI names rose in relative ranking, not because the MRVL thesis broke. Core operating principle #1: protect winners. Do not trim.

2026-06-01 96 +1

Held winner near 52w highs with strong momentum and constructive win-prob. Thesis percentile moderate (60) but the custom ASIC story is intact. Protect the position; no reason to trim given performance and momentum.

2026-05-31 95 -1

MRVL is the canonical 'protect the winner' case from our learnings — held at +24.7%, win_prob 72, performance percentile 78, catalyst directly aligned (optical/HBM/networking). All four specialists constructive. No reason to trim.

2026-05-30 96 0

Held winner up 24.7% since entry — winner-protection rule applies, floor at 75. All four specialists constructive, direct ticker coverage in catalyst flow, momentum strong. This is exactly the pattern we want to ride. Protect.

2026-05-29 96 +1

MRVL is a proven winner up 23% from entry with three of four specialists constructive. Per protect-winners rule (>20% gain, no breakdown signal), conviction stays well above 75. Custom ASIC/AI networking thesis intact, momentum strong. Hold the winner.

2026-05-28 95 -1

MRVL is a +22% winner — protect-winner rule applies. Win-prob 72, momentum and performance both in upper quartile, near 52wk high breakout setup. No specialist signals breakdown. Lack of direct catalyst today is noise; this is exactly the kind of winner our learnings tell us to run, not trim.

2026-05-27 96 +1

Held winner up 22% with all four specialists constructive and a direct, ticker-specific catalyst (Wall Street raising PTs into earnings, NVDA/AMD endorsements). This is exactly the breakout-with-direct-catalyst fingerprint from our wins. Protect the winner — do not trim into the catalyst.

2026-05-26 95 0

Held position up 24.8% — protect-winner rule applies (>20% gain, no specialist breakdown). Win-prob highest in batch at 72, momentum 89, performance 78. Thesis percentile slipped to 70 as newer names rose but Win-Prob and Catalyst both constructive on custom ASIC/AI networking. No rotation justification.

2026-05-25 95 0

MRVL is a held winner up nearly 20% with the strongest momentum in the batch and direct ASIC catalyst exposure. This matches our winning fingerprint exactly (52w high + AI infrastructure catalyst). Protect the winner — no specialist signaling breakdown.

2026-05-24 95 -2

MRVL up 19.4% from entry with perfect momentum reading and strong performance. Thesis 70, win_prob 68 — all four specialists constructive. This is the protect-the-winner case from our learnings (PANW analog). Hold at strong conviction, do not trim.

2026-05-23 97 +4

MRVL is a held winner at +19.4% with top momentum and constructive specialists across the board. Protect-winner rule applies — no specialist signals breakdown. Hold; sizing decision lives downstream.

2026-05-22 93 0

MRVL held with +19% PnL, top-decile momentum, performance_pct=74, and constructive win-probability. Three of four specialists positive. Protect this winner — exactly the Marvell pattern from recent learnings. No reduction warranted.

2026-05-21 93 +1

Winner up 16.5% with momentum at 94 and direct mention in AI chip rally coverage. All four specialists constructive. Protect the winner — no reason to trim a held name with this momentum profile and confirming catalyst.

2026-05-20 92 +1

MRVL up nearly 12% since entry with strong momentum (78) and constructive win-prob (68). Three of four specialists supportive; no breakdown signal. Per protect-winners rule and prior pattern (MRVL returned 65% historically), hold conviction firmly in the 75+ band.

2026-05-19 91 0

Held winner with constructive specialists across the board. Custom silicon and data center networking demand intact. Catalyst is indirect today but thesis remains supportive. Hold and let it run; don't add due to sector concentration.

2026-05-18 91 -3

MRVL held at meaningful weight with constructive thesis and win-probability. PnL essentially flat from entry but structural AI interconnect/custom silicon demand intact. Hold, don't add — sizer handles concentration.

2026-05-17 94 +2

MRVL has the highest momentum in the batch (94), win_prob 72, and is at breakout levels with hyperscaler ASIC wins. Held at +7.58%. Classic protect-the-winner setup matching our MRVL/MU learning template. Strong hold.

2026-05-16 92 -2

Classic winning pattern: strong momentum, approaching breakout, custom ASIC narrative intact, held position positive. Win-prob 72 is solid, performance 59 confirming. Pattern matches our prior MRVL winner setup. Protect.

2026-05-15 94

MRVL is a confirmed winner pattern: strong momentum (+6.3% 5d), approaching 52wk high, custom silicon design wins, +9% since entry. Win-prob 72 and momentum 84 are both supportive. This is exactly the kind of breakout-plus-AI-spend setup the recent learnings flag as a hold-with-conviction.

Supervisor: ATTENTION — the scoring pipeline has a non-blocking warning.